Tuesday, August 31, 2004

You can't top that

Part of the reason I started a blog was to get better at writing. The point is to write with enough frequency that certain things became easy. Eventually, my thinking goes, if I can become decent at a few of the baser elements of writing, then writing itself will become easier. The words will at least sound more natural as I hamfistedly put them to print.

Figuring out how to compose a sentence that is more comprehensible than Beowulf read in the Old English was the first hurdle. I’ll let you be the judge of whether I’ve cleared it or not. There were other, tertiary goals, but that was the first big one.

Prior to blog-form, I’d been infrequently fiddling with a bunch of short ideas, which are never to be confused with short stories. That’s the tricky part: making stories out of ideas. It took me a while to realize that. My plan was to write around my subject until a plot and characterization and themes just kind of happened. My college only offered creative writing classes every eighth solstice for a month of alternating weekends. So, lacking access to any greater insight, my way seemed as good as any to begin.

The problem is that I always started with that one thing I liked—sometimes a character, an idea or some kind of conceit—and I’d write until I’d fully fleshed out this particular thing, then I’d continue writing until I was bored, out of things to say, or pissed that my stories weren’t going anywhere. It was most often that last thing.

It was a flawed paradigm that was really only good for two things: making me angry and producing sentences that got progressively worse as the exercise went on. That’s the kind of flat-spin you can’t recover from, just ask Nine Inch Nails, or Maverick and Goose for that matter.

Maybe the worst part is that I’m left with a dozen or so sentences I genuinely like—up to about the first three on any given story.

I could start over, the germ of each idea has held up to repeated scrutiny. There’s just so much baggage there. All that time wrapped up in all those bad sentences. You either try to forget you wrote them, you revise them, or you just keep going and hope that somehow the train wreck untangles itself.

We all know what God says about building a house on a foundation of sand.

He’s against it.

So I never got past that tricky part—making an idea into a story—even once. And I’m too lazy to give the old ideas another try. I also have new ideas I’m afraid to screw up. So my fiction writing amounts to a handful of sentences that might have been something but stand in eternal testiment to the fact that I'm a quitter.

Want to hear some? Too bad, here they are:
Jon was born to the kind of parents who would freely add or sacrifice letters, silent or otherwise if necessary, to create the illusion of free-thought and novelty in the drudgerous and sacred act of child name giving.
Stanley Mortimer O’Brien was a boy given to spurts of intense contemplation. Even as an infant, his mother would often walk into the living room and find him in his playpen, teething ring hanging from the fleshy vice of his mouth, staring at a blank section of wall. During such episodes, he was totally imperturbable; general household racket could do nothing to break his concentration.
Astor Green spent the last moments of his life—thirteen years worth—wishing he had more damn time.
At Maya’s graduation party, with her friends and relatives and parent’s friends and various others gathered around, her mother had delivered a tear-filled speech in iambic pentameter extolling the virtues of her daughter.
By the time Jamie Daniels was nine, he was almost used to getting the piss beaten out of him on a regular basis. There was no reason to think it would stop anytime soon.
I also make up words a lot. That’s one more hurdle to get over I guess.

17 Comments:

At 9:17 AM, Blogger Luke said...

RE: "Hey, isn't your problem the problem of every writer in the world?"

My god, I'd love to think so.

I've learned from experience to assume that every snag and foible I have is unique to myself, then at best learning that others share the same issue. It's easier to handle than the converse, assuming I share in some global human flaw, then finding out that I just suck.

And people like you are the reason Seattle has the rainy city stigma attached to it.

You come for the one weekend the entire summer where we've had any kind of precipitation. lol

There were worries that the Sound, and the ocean at large were drying up it's been so beautiful here.

 
At 11:52 AM, Blogger samurphy said...

"There were worries that the Sound, and the ocean at large were drying up it's been so beautiful here."

LOL


I find that i write better when i don't read what i've written. That is not to say that i don't spell check or examine my grammar. I just don't dwell on it. Also, I've learned some things about writing from one of my math classes, oddly enough.

"You must say what you mean and mean what you say." -- Mathematical Thinking: Problem-Solving and Proofs 2ed John P. D'Angelo, Douglas B. West.

and...

"Absolute rigor is destructive to intuition." -- J. Rosenblatt

That's the text and the teacher, respectively of math 347 @ uiuc. So, that has helped me. Maybe it can help you?

 
At 12:45 PM, Blogger Luke said...

"Absolute rigor is destructive to intuition." -- J. Rosenblatt

I really like that, as it fits perfectly with my one draft paper writing philosophy.

3 am morning of due date, rigor of any kind is impossible.

Re: Rafael: "My impression right now, then, is that what we (you and me, beginning writers) need to do is try to read good literature and learn from it."

When I do that I just end up biting the writer's steez. if you look in the archives in like late july I sound just like Kurt Vonnegut--but more whiney.

 
At 1:42 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I've been writing short stories lately with a group of guys from my high school (who, oddly enough, I was totally not cool enough for during high school itself). We get a title (examples: A Simple Error in Judgement, Thin Ice, 88 Cents from Anybody, The Park) and lately, a genre (examples: magical realism, erotic comedy, distopian). We have about 2 weeks to submit, then we vote and the winner chooses the next title/genre. I've also always wanted to write stories, but had problems coming up with plots. Somehow the restriction to a specific title and genre (and the deadline) inspires me... not enough to write as good of stories as the rest of the guys in the group, but I'm usually proud of them. Plus it's really fun to read everybody else's stories...

 
At 1:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bah. Stupid anonymous posting. That last one was Aleah, by the way. Why can't we fill in our names like on normal blogs...

 
At 1:50 PM, Blogger Luke said...

Aleah, in response to your and Mike's hatred of my (blogger's native) comment system, I guess I probably just need to get haloscan . . .

is that what you use Mikey?

 
At 1:51 PM, Blogger Luke said...

And it's not half as bad as ben's thing, livejournal, you have to prove you aren't a comment bot if you post anonymously there.

 
At 2:24 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Luke - above you were able to initiate five relatively rich characterizations in just a few sentences each.

("I'm not a writing professor but I play one on T.V.")
Maybe this suggestion is something so dumb that it just ... might ... work ...

Throw away everything else you've concocted for each of them, then conjure up an event or a place or any singular context where somehow all five of these folks are related. Maybe not in the same space and time.
They may or they may not realize it, it may be significant or ironic, tangential, morose, all of the above. They may be part of someone else's larger narrative, they may be the ensemble background of some other loser's bad day. Maybe a stupid comment at a petty moment in one life has a devestating or resurrecting effect in someone else's domain. Isn't that how things work anyway? Maybe put one of them in the first person and let them rant the way you do. Who knows. Just get them all into the stew and see what you boil up. Have a stupid point but make it well. And it's an experiment so lighten up :-)

Just my 1 cent.

- Don Sheffler

 
At 5:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Heh. You've just described the 'Dark Tower' series from Stephen King. I've only read the first three books (I need to go back, read them again, and then read the others), but there is just a hint that King was doing just what you suggested, Don.

--Mike Sheffler

 
At 7:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You know, Mike, just as I hit "Publish" on that comment my thoughts were on Stephen King. I was actually thinking about The Stand but same idea. Luke, if your forte is character development then that's a great cornerstone for storytelling. I was also thinking of a couple of movies I saw this last year, The Hours, and Adaptation, in that a common key was the intricate and deliberate weaving of separate characters, separate realities really, into a story that completely revealed itself only upon conclusion.

I'm in the middle of Dark Tower IV, by the way. In the Preface, King is reminiscing about his younger days when he first determined that one day he would write the greatest epic of all time.

Nice juxtaposition to Luke's search for a good short story.

- Don Sheffler

 
At 4:54 PM, Blogger Luke said...

The most stark juxtaposition of all being that King has writen hundreds of things, I, none.

That's a good idea though Don, something Decameronish

 
At 9:50 AM, Blogger Luke said...

Aleah,

Do you read magic realism? You should give me some names if you do.

I've only really gotten my paws on Garcia Marquez and Toni Morrison. Beloved I can take or leave, One Hundred Years of Solitude is maybe my favorite book ever.

The one idea I have for a novel would be pretty deep in the magic realism genre.

I'm excited to hear from you on this.

 
At 11:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, I am just discovering the genre... I am, however, a true lover of surrealism, which in its truest form has a lot in common with magical realism. By true form I mean Magritte, for instance, vs. Dali. Magritte (and sad to say I stole this quote from a card at SFMOMA, I didn't come up with it myself), "rather than creating fantasy imagery [like Dali], he evokes the strangeness and ambiguity latent in reality". What I love about surrealism (and I think is the appeal of magical realism) is that it forces you to reconsider reality and see everything in a different way... Sorry I can't help you with the authors (but I can send you the story submissions for that round if you want).

--Aleah

 
At 11:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, I am just discovering the genre... I am, however, a true lover of surrealism, which in its truest form has a lot in common with magical realism. By true form I mean Magritte, for instance, vs. Dali. Magritte (and sad to say I stole this quote from a card at SFMOMA, I didn't come up with it myself), "rather than creating fantasy imagery [like Dali], he evokes the strangeness and ambiguity latent in reality". What I love about surrealism (and I think is the appeal of magical realism) is that it forces you to reconsider reality and see everything in a different way... Sorry I can't help you with the authors (but I can send you the story submissions for that round if you want).

--Aleah

 
At 11:31 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Unfortunately, I am just discovering the genre... I am, however, a true lover of surrealism, which in its truest form has a lot in common with magical realism. By true form I mean Magritte, for instance, vs. Dali. Magritte (and sad to say I stole this quote from a card at SFMOMA, I didn't come up with it myself), "rather than creating fantasy imagery [like Dali], he evokes the strangeness and ambiguity latent in reality". What I love about surrealism (and I think is the appeal of magical realism) is that it forces you to reconsider reality and see everything in a different way... Sorry I can't help you with the authors (but I can send you the story submissions for that round if you want).

--Aleah

 
At 11:33 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sorry about the triple post - safari informed me twice that blogger wasn't responding when I published... but clearly it was. Arrrgh.
--Aleah

 
At 11:37 AM, Blogger Luke said...

That's great Aleah, I'd never seen . . . or rather I'd never recognized that as the work of Magritte.

You're right about calling him more authentic than Dali--even though I really know nothing about Magritte apart from a handfull of websites.

It's a shame more drug-addled high schoolers don't go through a Magritte phase instead of a Dali phase. There'd be more good art made at a young age.


---don't worry about the triple post, it makes people think other people care enough to comment ;)

 

Post a Comment

<< Home